1. The first impression would be Elon Musk when people think of revolution in car industry. They think of Tesla but not REVA. Although both share the same source of energy (Ion-lithium), results they produced are totally different. It’s like Albert Einstein versus Alfred Noble, nuclear versus dynamite.
Unfortunately in nowadays, Tesla is still considered new and remained suspicion by majority for their reliability. People may have known more about the time for charging than its unprecedented concept; the hourly charging has always been their main topic all the time.
However, its “bad habit” for charging is not incurable; there’s a setting for which the user can choose the voltage or ampere they want, lower power takes more time but costs lesser and higher power takes lesser time but costs more.
Thus a user can monitor the charging cost through utilizing the charging time. So far, 70A/240V is the highest power for charging in less than 4 hours. It’s still not a good remedy when comparing with the time of fuel injection, but the time sounds more cheerful than charging a cell phone.
It’s true that an EV would have a better life expectancy than a fuel injected vehicle because it’s solely relying on electricity instead of combustion. The horse power of it would also be much harder to disintegrate off through years. Thus making the car ultra reliable.
In order to shorten the moment of charging into the most ideal time for which is enough to compete with the time of fuel injection, it’s a necessity that the power needs to be around 150A /240V. If not, the fact of compromising still exists.
0 comments:
Post a Comment